Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 01 - Streets and Related Infrastructure WL1 \' City Council Workshop - Streets Bryan Beck, P. E . Public Works February 24, 2020 CRAP 1'IY r c s '- Today's Workshop • Street Network/Maintenance Program • Signals, Markings and Signs � Network/Maintenance Program • Proposed Capital Improvement Projects • Council Discussion/Direction A VI Yr e x .w s Street Maintenance Program • 2018 IMS Paving Assessment — Measuresg� avement rutting, provides a p ride index, rates cracking with video analysis for every street • Deliverables — Pavement ratings by block — Projects 5 yr. funding need UU V Overall Assessment • Paving quality is good but falling • Inflation has reducedurchasin ower b p gp Y 31% in 10 years • Large arterial projects built in 90's and 2000's are due for maintenance . PAVEMENT CONDITION oa oa m, t , Qoo Qoo l V Yr x Staff Recommendation — Street r Maintenance Program • Increase annual funding by $2,900,000 • Expand Tarrant County Partnership — Roughly 50% reduction in City's cost • Use contractors for asphalt overlays and concrete panel work • Reevaluate in 2023 Work Plan FIS (2021-2023) ■ Asphalt Milling/Overlay (In-Douse) ■Asphalt Milline/Overlay (Contracted) Concrete Panel Repairs (Contracted) ■MiCFO stir facilig (Contracted) lwp�= Crack Sealing/Pothole Repairs(In-house) UU V N Sign aIs/ M a rki n s Si ns Maintenance Program --'L---__—__ �__—__----.C3--__.l 7 t , City of Grapevine Traffic Signals � I VINE R iNG��S EE P ` T x. 4 � 0 ` I . Y J i 1 �.Ikg�St f2, j Traffic Signals 4t °al+as Ra E City 35 Signals ft State 37 Signals •��°° � na � ~_I Grapevine City Limits yrye a I KI 0 0,5 1 2 Miles al n HahnRb I _—! Es i.HE UU V Sign a Is/ M a rki n s Si ns Analysis Asset Value Annual Needs Signals 72 ea. $450,000 $32,400,000 35 $925,000 Markings (Striping) 75 miles $10,000 $750,000 5 $150,000 Markings (Crosswalks) 500 ea. $500 $250,000 5 $50,000 Signs (all types) 8,000 ea. $50 $400,000 10 $40,000 Estimated Annual Need $1,165,000 Current Annual Funding $ 800,000 CRAP 1'IY Overall Assessment & Recommendation • Overall Assessment — Signal system is in good shape � — Markings and signs are in fair condition — Inflation has reduced purchasing power by 31% in 10 years • Staff Recommendation — Increase Signal/Marking/Sign funding annually by $365,000 GRU Y Y r c sr Capital Improvement Projects • Selection Criteria : — Staff Analysis of City's MTP — Funding Partnerships — Engagement with City Council/Community CRAP 1'IY r c s Proposed Projects • Kimball Extension • Bass Pro/SH 26 Intersection Expansion � • Jones Street Extension • Wall Street Reconstruction/Improvements • Worth Street Reconstruction • Barton Street Parking Lot GRA V Yr x Kimball Extension — SH 26 to Mustang @ S .W. GPkwy. • Estimated at $4,600,000 ( Fund at 50%) • Improved circulation around GCISD • Improved southbound access to SH 121 • Alignment/ROW on DFW Property • Likely Tarrant County Walrpart/SAMs funding partnership • DFWAirport nUs qPG OR ..- Mi6m1IA'���'ypqq pF;4• C wV l6WOxM�mM � h CRta�GLwoaoR � xnxLnHp� - A��� •?�v - HAWMST MLL DR G e � T}�T,, GRA V Yr x Kimball Extension Alternate Alignment • Simplifies crossings at Mustang • Coordination with DFW Airport development p p - - - - 'Walmart/SAM i z •� _--_-----pe54yE •� k 6 /fQ 4 / f rlr�AN*+�•*.r.........r+w DFWAirport ■ J' nwcmun N�qy- � ••I Cwu��woaiH9a�_ �+��a O a os�ao � GRA V Yr x Bass Pro/SH 26 Intersection Expansion • Estimated at $450,000 ( Fund at 50%) • SB SH 26 to EB Bass Pro additional left • NB SH 26 to EB additional right • 50% of traffic in this intersection turning • Tarrant County funding o . o-Q partnership n — 50% on constructionXV we.e dR 9 d DFWAirport s� UU V Jones Street Extension • Estimated at $500,000 • Connects to recent subdivision • ROW acquisition is underway 5 Grapevine �rR■r■■Rug, rumreJo,esSHill i Addition 3 i ■ �.... ■ i4R�ER Atr Cluck Park GRA *V NE Wall Street Yr E k .w S Reconstruction/ Improvements — Main to Austin • Estimated at $750,000 • Reconstruct roadway with curb utter and /� sidewalks • Pedestrian connectivity to Main a I EST'NWY'•'"'-T I'I.'. �.4. E NORTH%VE ST FIWY ENO RT HW EST FFUY - N. E Wa I I St rr_ ST E$TELL ST y y - Ell 2 M � �^y1 W y L.r G Vjl EXAMS ST Q© C ETIXAS ST f iFr':,S SI GRA *V NE Wall Street Yr E k .w S Reconstruction/ Improvements — Ball to Main • Estimated at $ 1,650,000 • Reconstruct roadway with curb utter and /� sidewalks • Pedestrian connectivity to Main ti !'J I':O RT F[4'JEST Ii!'JY i m s a Q I 1 .....■.■.■..■.■.■ W Wa I I St N � N o C ¢ 2 Q N � N I J I TEXAS ST i GRA V N Yr . Worth Street Reconstruction— Austin to Ruth • Estimated at $875,000 • Serves K- 12 Campus • Improve on street parking • Roadway in poor condition E Worth St N a GRU Y Y r c sr Barton Street Parking Lot • Estimated at $500,000 • Adding 26 public parking spaces � • Located at old IT building site • Frontier fiber conflict LLJ r ,s 11.1 - I - III- 1 - Tri CXAP VIN- Summary of Staff r c s Recommendation • Seven capital projects totaling $6,800,000 • Increase Street Maintenance funding � annually by $2,900,000 • Increase Signal/Marking/Sign funding annually by $365,000 WL1 \' Discussion / Next Steps WL1 \' Background Slides UU V Pavement Management Strategy 40%of pavement life Excellent has a 15%drop in quality Very Good 15%of pavement life R Good $1 spent now �' has a 40% drop in quality c E Fair E R a Poor Costs$8 if delayed �nL Very Poor curve erpance Time Pavement Life Cycle Curve Target Zone for Pavement RehabW�!ation 3 d ...Increased Pavement Life a Un-rehabilitated Pavement Pe;,jnrmance Time *GRA V N - Yr 4-J U y _ - I IMS PAVEMENT INSPECTED CONOfIION 912010 - - mr