The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1989-01-03 Regular Meeting_S 3 f i t s � S AGENDA CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY, JANUARY 3 , 1989 AT 7 :30 P.M. s COUNCIL CHAMBERS - MUNICIPAL COURT ROOM #205 � 307 WEST DALLAS ROAD CALL TO ORDER 4 'r INVOCATION: Council Member Lynn R. Niedermeier CITIZENS REQUEST ; � z 1 . Mr. Richard L. Rogers, Branch Manager of the Carswell ' Federal Credit Union, to address the City Council relative to peripheral street fee assessment for future expansion of Nash Street. OLD BUSINESS 2 . Consider Zoning Application Z88-09 (tabled during the November 15 and December 20, 1988 Council meetings) submit- ted by the City of Grapevine requesting rezoning of 2+ acres from "HC" Highway Commercial District to "CBD" Central Business District, and a subsequent ordinance, if appli- 4 cable. (The property is located south of Northwest Highway, north of the intersection of Wall Street and South Main Street, east of Barton Street, and west of Jenkins Street. ) � 3 . Consider proposed amendments to Comprehensive Zoning Ordi- nance No. 82-73, as amended, Section 26 "HC" Highway Commer- cial District as recommended by the Planning & Zoning Commission, and a subsequent ordinance, if applicable. NEW BUSINESS 4. Consider authorizing the Acting City Manager to enter into a contract in the amount of $84, 310 . 00 with Freese and � Nichols, Inc. and Reed Stowe and Company to provide consul- tant services in developing impact fees relating to water and wastewater facilities in accordance with Senate Bill 336 requirements and take any necessary action. 5 . Consider awarding a contract to Carter and Burgess, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $26,500 . 00 for Streetscape Design Serv�ces, Phase I , and take any necessary action. 6 . Council to review Festivals Commission policies and proce- dures and take any necessary action. ; 7 . Council to review Tarrant County Health Department Inter- governmental Agreement and take any necessary action. CONSENT AGENDA Consent items are deemed to need little Council deliberation and will be acted upon as one business item. Any member of the City Council or member of the audience may request that an item be withdrawn from the consent agenda and placed before the Council = for full discussion. Approval of the consent agenda authorizes r the City Manager, or his designee, to implement each item in accordance with Staff recommendations. 8 . Consider an ordinance amending the Grapevine Code of Ordi- nances, Chapter 7 , Article I, Buildings and Construction, Section 7-3 relative to amendments to the Grapevine Building s Code to eliminate fire resistive requirements of exterior walls as the Building Code applies to property zoned "R-5. 0" Zero Lot Line District. Director of Community Development recommends approval. 9. Consider an ordinance amending the Grapevine Code of Ordi- nances, Appendix B, Section 2, Plat Approval, relative to revising plat filing fees. Director of Public Works recom- mends approval. EXECUTIVE SESSION 10 . City Council to recess to Conference Room #204 to discuss : real estate (ground lease from Dallas/Fort Worth Inter- national Airport at the intersection of Spur 382 and Dallas Road) under amendments to Article 6252-17, V.A.T.C.S. , Subsection 2 (f) . City Council to reconvene in the Council Chambers and take any necessary action relative to real estate (ground lease from Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport at the inter- section of Spur 382 and Dallas Road) under amendments to Article 6252-17, V.A.T.C.S. , Subsection 2 (f) . MISCELLANEOUS REPORTS AND/OR DISCUSSION ADJOURNMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 6252-17 , V.A.T.C.S. , AS AMENDED BY CHAPTER 227, ACTS OF THE 61ST LEGISLATURE, REGULAR SESSION, THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA WAS PREPARED AND POSTED ON THIS THE 30TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 1988 AT 5:00 P.M. w City Secretary � i i i ' I i. 1 ' STATE OF TEXAS ; COUNTY OF TARRANT CITY OF GRAPEVINE ; The City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas met in Regular � Session on this the 3rd day of January, 1989 at 7 :30 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Municipal Court Room #205, 307 West Dallas Road, '� with the following members present to-wit: t� William D. Tate Mayor ; Ted R. Ware Mayor Pro Tem Jim Glynn Council Member Sharron Spencer Council Member �� C. Shane Wilbanks Council Member ' Lynn R. Niedermeier Council Member � Gil Traverse Council Member ' constituting a quorum, with the following members of the City ; Staff: � � Kelvin Knauf Acting City Manager � John F. Boyle, Jr. City Attorney Linda Huff City Secretary � ! 4' f CALL TO ORDER ''' Mayor Tate called the meeting to order at 7 : 35 p.m. 7 �; INVOCATION �� i Council Member Niedermeier delivered the Invocation. � , � i � ITEM 1. CITIZENS REQUEST, MR. RICHARD L. ROGERS < A{ Mr. Richard L. Rogers, Branch Manager of Carswell Federal Credit ` " Union, addressed the City Council relative to the peripheral street ` � improvement fee required (for future expansion of Nash Street) � prior to the issuance of a building permit to add a drive through i window at 925 Nash Street. He requested Council consideration to � � postpone the peripheral street improvement fee assessment until the � � expansion of Nash Street occurs. The amount of the fee is � :; comparable to the entire cost of the structural improvement, and as =' � a non-profit tax exempt cooperative, the fee is extremely large for �' i the Credit Union at this time. }: i P ; Council Member Traverse requested that the peripheral street � 'j improvement fee assessment relative to Carswell Federal Credit € ! Union be placed on the next Council agenda for discussion. ., ; F 'i ITEM 2. ORDINANCE, ZONING APPLICATION Z88-09, CITY OF GRAPEVINE " (SOUTH MAIN) I Director of Community Development H. T. Hardy stated that Zoning ' Application Z88-09 was filed by the City of Grapevine requesting , i rezoning of 2± acres from "HC" Highway Commercial District to "CBD" j Central Business District. The property is located south of �. ; i Northwest Highway, north of the intersection of Wall Street and � ; South Main Street, east of Barton Street, and west of Jenkins ; Street. (This item was tabled during the November 15 and ° December 20 , 1988 Council meetings. The recommendation of the �; I Planning & Zoning Commission during the December 20 meeting was � � that the rezoning not be approved as the amendments to Section 26 "HC" Highway Commercial District would solve the development needs �; of the property owners. ) `' i I i � � � � � � � � � O1/03/89 � � ;:. £ Director of Community Development H. T. Hardy stated Staff had � contacted the owners of the property that fronts on Northwest $ Highway as to whether they would deed restrict their property to 4 provide a landscape front yard, if the property were rezoned. The owners were not willing to deed restrict their property. The owner a' of the southwest corner (Evans, Birmingham, Williamson, Inc. ) � requested their portion of the zoning case be withdrawn from � consideration. Mr. Jim Armstrong, owner of the tract on the southeast corner, has no plans to redevelop his property. r . Mr. Hardy reviewed wall maps showing how the buildings set on Northwest Highway and the intensity of development. The bulk of the problem was shown to be on the south side of Northwest Highway f z from Main Street to Dooley Street. Council' s concern was that to € amend the Highway Commercial District to solve development problems along Northwest Highway would create front yard setback problems in other areas of the Highway Commercial District within the City. Staff was then directed to review the zoning ordinance to determine what amendments would relieve the development problems of Northwest x � Highway. x � Following discussion, it was the consensus of the City Council to consider only the Millard Dilg property for rezoning to "CBD" Central Business District, as his property would then be zoned � contiguous to the existing "CBD" Central Business District. ` � ¢ The caption of the proposed ordinance was read into the record. � � t Council Member Traverse made a motion that Lots A, B, and C, known F as the Dilg Property, be rezoned from "HC" Highway Commercial � District to "CBD" Central Business District. Council Member � � Wilbanks offered a second to the motion which prevailed by the � following vote: s � � Ayes: Tate, Ware, Glynn, Spencer, Wilbanks, Niedermeier, & Traverse ? � Nays: None t x d City Attorney John F. Boyle, Jr. advised that the City Council ' needed to take action on the remainder of the zoning case (the Armstrong property and the Evans property) . Council Member Glynn made a motion to deny the remainder of Zoning � Application Z88-09 . Mayor Pro Tem Ware offered a second to the € motion which prevailed by the following vote: � a � Ayes: Tate, Ware, Glynn, Spencer, Wilbanks, Niedermeier, & Traverse x; Nays: None ORDINANCE NO. 89-01 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 82-73, s. THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE � CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, SAME BEING ALSO � KNOWN AS APPENDIX "D" OF THE CITY CODE OF � GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON �; A TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBED AS BEING A LOT, f i TRACT, OR PARCEL OF LAND LYING AND BEING � SITUATED IN TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, BEING LOTS A, B, AND C OF THE REVISED G. G. STARR ADDITION IN THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN THE BODY OF THIS ORDINANCE; ORDERING A CHANGE IN � THE USE OF SAID PROPERTY FROM "HC" HIGHWAY ; COMMERCIAL DISTRICT TO "CBD" CENTRAL BUSINESS ; DISTRICT; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; ;. PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A CLAUSE RELATING TO + SEVERABILITY; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC § INTERESTS , MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND A ZONING CHANGE AND AMENDMENT THEREIN MADE; PROVIDING A PENALTY OF FINE NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2, 000 . 00) FOR � � � � �2) � � � ,. � i O1/03/89 �� i � � � E: i k' i EACH OFFENSE AND A SEPARATE OFFENSE SHALL BE � ? DEEMED COMMITTED EACH DAY DURING OR ON WHICH a ! AN OFFENSE OCCURS OR CONTINUES; DECLARING AN a � EMERGENCY AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE _ � � , 1 � i ITEM 3. PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE � ; NO. 82-73, SECTION 26 "HC" HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT � � � ' Director of Community Development H.T. Hardy reported that at the a � December 20, 1988 joint meeting, the Planning & Zoning Commission � recommended Section 26 "HC" Highway Commercial District of the e ? Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 82-73, as amended, be amended as � � follows: reduce the open space from 15$ to 10$, reduce the front � yard setback from twenty-five (25) feet to ten (10) feet, eliminate � � maximum building coverage, and change the principal structure height from one (1) story to two (2) story, or thirty-five (35) " j feet. � 1 j Mr. Hardy stated that as a result of the discussion during � ; consideration of Zoning Application Z88-09, Staff requested that # � amendments to Section 26 be tabled to the January 17, 1989 meeting. � � Mayor Pro Tem Ware then made a motion to table the item to the �' January 17 , 1989 meeting. The motion was seconded by Council �' , Member Traverse and prevailed by the following vote: _ i { � Ayes: Tate, Ware, Glynn, Spencer, Wilbanks, Niedermeier, & Traverse � Nays: None � � (: 1 i � � P ±, ITEM 4. AUTHORIZE IMPACT FEE CONSULTANT STUDY, FREESE AND ` � NICHOLS, INC. AND REED STOWE AND COMPANY � f ' Mana er of En ineerin Stan Laster re uested authorization for the � � 9 g g q F Acting City Manager to enter into a contract with Freese and � Nichols Engineers, Inc. and Reed Stowe and Company to provide 6 � consultant services in developing impact fees relating to water and ,� wastewater facilities in accordance with Senate Bill 336 � requirements . The cost for the study would be in the amount of � � $84,310. 00 . The proposal includes six main elements: (1) develop � up-to-date land use assumptions for a 10 year planning period, (2) �' � update the Water Distribution System Master Plan, (3) update the ` Wastewater Collection System Master Plan, (4) develop a capital R improvement project plan for water and wastewater based on a 10 year �' planning period, (5) calculate impact fees based on the land use � j and capital improvement project plan, and (6) develop an F� � administration and account system to track the receipt and �' disbursement of individual fees. Mr. Laster stated that Items 1, � � 4, 5 , and 6 are required by Senate Bill 336 , and that Items 2 and 3 : � were requested by Staff in order to establish an up-to-date � ' database for beginning the analysis and preparation of the 10 year E; ; plan. i � � , � City Attorney John F. Boyle, Jr. advised that the current City � ordinances will remain in effect until June, 1990, and in order to � { place into effect ordinances that will be in compliance with Senate � J � Bill 336, these are the necessary steps to continue to collect �he �{ , impact fees. � r j City Council discussion ensued with questions as to what items � � would have to be updated and how often. (Items 1 and 4 would need � to be revised every three years. ) Deliberation also included � j comments relative to the development of a Storm Drainage Master � � Plan. ; � j Council Member Glynn made a motion to authorize the Acting City � i Manager to enter into a contract with Freese and Nichols Engineers, � � Inc. and Reed Stowe and Company to provide consultant services in � � developing impact fees relating to water and wastewater facilities � � in accordance with Senate Bill 336 requirements at a cost not to � � exceed $84, 310 . 00. Mayor Pro Tem Ware offered a second to the j motion which prevailed by the following vote: � � a ' i (3) � � s � � � � O1/03/89 � � � � � i � Ayes : Tate, Ware, Glynn, Spencer, Wilbanks, Niedermeier & Traverse ; ; Nays: None g � � �: ITEM 5 . AUTHORIZE STREETSCAPE DESIGN SERVICES, PHASE I , CARTER � AND BURGESS, INC. � � Main Street Project Director Terry Colley introduced Mr. John � Mason, of Carter and Burgess, Inc. , to give a brief presentation � relative to the proposed Streetscape Design Services, Phase I . � During Mr. Mason' s presentation, he outlined the responsibilities �: and duties of each of the firms that would be involved with the r project: Carter and Burgess, Inc. , urban design/engineering; � LandCorp, communication network and quality control; and Komatsu & � Associates, Inc. , architectural context. Once the Phase I � schematic design is completed, the City Council would then need to determine whether or not to proceed with Phase II , which would t consist of the construction drawings, specifications and the actual � construction of the streetscape project. The Streetscape Project � will consist of new sidewalks, lighting, benches, trees, and the = ! possible removal of the "crown" in the center of Main Street. � � � City Council discussion included possible grant funding for the £ Streetscape Project after the design is completed. �' � � Following deliberation, Mr. Colley requested that the City Council � direct the Acting City Manager to enter into a contract with Carter � and Burgess, Inc. for Streetscape Design Services, Phase I in an " amount of $22, 500 . 00 plus an additional $4, 000. 00 for renderings � and sketches, if needed. � � Council Member Traverse then made a motion to award the contract to Carter and Burgess, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $26, 500. 00 for � Streetscape Design Services, Phase I. Council Member Glynn offered � a second to the motion which prevailed by the following vote: `� � � Ayes: Tate, Ware, Glynn, Spencer, Wilbanks, Niedermeier, & Traverse � Nays: None � � � � ¢: ITEM 6 . DISCUSSION, FESTIVALS COMMISSION � tt Executive Director of the Convention & Visitors Bureau P.W. 4 McCallum reported that the Festivals Commission was established by � Resolution No. 88-12, March 1 , 1988 . The purpose of the Commission � is to promote local events and festivals in the City and to shift � the burden of financial obligation from local civic groups, ` businesses and individuals to the Festivals Commission. The � Commission has filed for 501C3 non-profit status to allow � sponsorship funds and donations from major corporations. He � reported the membership of the Commission (representatives from ;. City Departments and various local groups) works very well together � and reports to the Convention & Visitors Bureau Board of Directors. � . � Council discussion included concern that the Festivals Commission � currently does not outline their proposed events and bring them � before the City Council for approval when an event will involve � areas of Grapevine other than the downtown area. i � Following brief discussion, the consensus was that the Festivals Commission would adopt the policy that anytime an event moves from k the downtown area and a proposed route has been approved by the � Police Department, etc. , the proposal would then go before the City � Council for approval. ? � � � , � ITEM 7. REVIEW TARRANT COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT INTER- � � GOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT � � Director of Community Development H. T. Hardy advised that in 1987 � the City entered into, and renewed in 1988, an inter-local � agreement with Tarrant County Health Department to provide food � � � (4) � � � Y" O1/03/89 � i ' inspections at restaurants and retail food establishments . Health ' Department restrictions for temporary health permits, which would � j apply to festivals sponsored by the City, churches, etc. , have made ;; � it difficult for some groups to participate in locally sponsored t a events. Ms. Gail Schneider, coordinator of Main Street Days and Grapefest, addressed the City Council relative to the Health Department ! requirements for temporary food sales . She noted that the ' � construction of stands was the main problem. Mr. Larry Prine, representing the Tarrant County Health Department, briefly ; addressed the Council stating the standards do not apply to all food sales, only those that are prepared on site. City Attorney John F. Boyle, Jr. stated that the issue was not the inter-local agreement, but what rules for temporary food f I establishments have been established by the State Health Depart- a � ment, are those rules applicable as minimum standards, and do the � minimum standards incorporate specifically all the temporary food � '' establishment requirements. He recommended that Mr. H. T. Hardy, � ; Mr. Kelvin Knauf and himself evaluate the requirements and report � ?� back to the Council within thirty (30) days. �' � '• Following discussion, Mayor Pro Tem Ware offered a motion to direct ` ' City Staff and the City Attorney to review the Temporary Food �� Establishment Requirements and report back to the City Council. � Council Member Glynn offered a second to the motion which prevailed � '� by the following vote: � � Ayes: Tate, Ware, Glynn, Spencer, Wilbanks, Niedermeier, & Traverse ; Nays: None �� ; � 9 � CONSENT AGENDA �' ;; The City Council considered the consent agenda items, which were � � deemed to need little or no discussion and were acted upon as one £ ; business item. Mayor Tate asked if there was any member of the � audience or the City Council who wished to remove an item from the � � consent agenda for full discussion. There were none. % � Item 8 . Ordinance, Amend Chapter 7, Article I, Buildings and �� Construction � � I Director of Community Development recommended approval of an �. a ordinance amending the Grapevine Code of Ordinances, Chapter 7, � Article I , Buildings and Construction, Section 7-3 relative to �' amendments to the Grapevine Building Code to eliminate fire ':� resistive requirements of exterior walls as the Building Code �. applies to property zoned "R-5 . 0" Zero Lot Line District. �; ;. � The caption of the proposed ordinance was read into the record. � � � � Motion by Council Member Spencer and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ware E � to adopt the ordinance as recommended prevailed by the following :i vote: ` � E; � � Ayes: Tate, Ware, Glynn, Spencer, Wilbanks, Niedermeier, & Traverse F: ? Nays: None � ; ORDINANCE NO. 89-02 �� AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS � i AMENDING CHAPTER 7 OF THE GRAPEVINE CODE OF � 4 ! ORDINANCES BY AMENDING SECTION 7-3 RELATING � TO AMENDMENTS TO THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE; i PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A � PENALTY OF FINE NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF TWO � t THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2 , 000 . 00) FOR EACH OFFENSE i AND A SEPARATE OFFENSE SHALL BE DEEMED � COMMITTED UPON EACH DAY DURING OR ON WHICH AN � OFFENSE OCCURS OR CONTINUES; DECLARING AN � '� EMERGENCY AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE � , � � (5) ; ; � � � � O1/03/89 � � � � � 4 Item 9. Ordinance, Amend Appendix B, Section 2, Plat Filing Fees � �. Director of Public Works recommended approval of an ordinance � amending the Grapevine Code of Ordinances, Appendix B, Section 2, � Plat Approval, relative to revising plat filing fees. � � The caption of the proposed ordinance was read into the record. � Motion by Council Member Spencer and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ware � to adopt as recommended prevailed by the following vote: �', � � Ayes: Tate, Ware, Glynn, Spencer, Wilbanks, Niedermeier, & Traverse � � Nays: None ;' �. � ORDINANCE NO. 89-03 � � f AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, ' AMENDING THE GRAPEVINE CODE OF ORDINANCES BY � AMENDING APPENDIX B, SECTION 2 , PLAT r APPROVAL; BY AMENDING SUB-SECTION (B) (16) RELATING TO FINAL PLAT FEES; BY AMENDING �' SUBSECTION (C) (7) RELATING TO RESUBDIVISION � AND REPLAT FEES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; DECLARING AN EMERGENCY AND PROVIDING � � AN EFFECTIVE DATE � � � ITEM 10 . EXECUTIVE SESSION � � Mayor Tate announced the City Council would recess to Conference 4 Room #204 to discuss real estate (ground lease from Dallas/Fort � Worth International Airport at the intersection of Spur 382 and � Dallas Road) under amendments to Article 6252-17 , V.A.T.C. S. , s Subsection 2 (f) . _ � Al1 Council members were present upon reconvening in the Council � Chambers. � � � Acting City Manager Kelvin Knauf reported there was no action � necessary as a result of the Executive Session relative to real � estate (ground lease from Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport � at the intersection of Spur 382 and Dallas Road) under amendments � to Article 6252-17, V.A.T.C.S. , Subsection 2 (f) . � , � �. �:. MISCELLANEOUS REPORTS AND/OR DISCUSSION �. ITEM 10A. Mayor Tate announced that he and Mr. Knauf would be � meeting with the Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport � Board tomorrow to clarify some issues. They have � requested that a City representative be appointed to � work with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and � the Airport in regards to airport noise negotiations. � It was the consensus of the Council that the City should � be represented by an individual that has expertise in � airport development. Mayor Tate requested the issue be t placed on the January 17 , 1989 agenda. , � ITEM lOB. Council Member Wilbanks announced the Council would be interviewing City Manager applicants in Executive Session on January 4 and 5, 1989. � � ;; c. ADJOURNMENT � � ,. There being no further business to be discussed by the City � Council, Council Member Spencer offered a motion to adjourn the ; meeting at 10: 20 p.m. Mayor Pro Tem Ware seconded the motion which ' prevailed by the following vote: � Ayes: Tate, Ware, Glynn, Spencer, Wilbanks, Niedermeier, & Traverse �' Nays: None � � t � (6) � � r O1/03/89 � PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, ' TEXAS on this the 17th day of January , 1989. ' � APPROVED: � Mayor k ATTEST: . k ��+�.tLK/ City Secretary ; , I F t t k �i � { S � � a k (' & # d F , f 4 4 [' F R ('. � f 1' f � �' �: l. fr I� `�/ � I �