HomeMy WebLinkAboutCA2012-84CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS APPLICATION
Date 112-S. a0KA-- I Number CA / 2—
I Property Owner Name, Address & Phone Number I
r�
Tenant Name/Occupency /Use
f
Appll;int Name Address S Phone Number
- r4-M _
Phone:
Mobile
Email:
1 Description
Mock 4 Lot 3
Subdivision
Request/Description of Work to Be Done p. 9 ,W/ uo>kje�
0912n Fj ISWAT' *2.4e- CCC L7 i'`nl i��✓, ! ..,�J.n -� t�� 4 _ �?7�r lam. ��
Drawings/Sketches Attached
Yes o No
Attached
Photo ra hs Attached
Current o Historic
I hereby certify that this information is correct to the best of my knowledge and that the said work will be done in conformance
with all submissions herein set forth, and in compliance with the City of Grapevine's Historic Overlay District Ordinances and
Building Codes. APPROVAL OF A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS DOES NOT CONSTITUTE APPROVAL OF
OTHER REQUIRED ILD/NG PERMITS.
aw
signed x `,� Print Name ��S►IDtt� T.ZIQ�%�f/J
A;N TIA 61 L„e:, office use
o Approved o I Approved with Conditions:
X //I Z-2 _/ 1/> _ x
X / Date A Q l l,,,�,% .2-
suhwv orriaw
THIS IS NOT A BUILDING PERMIT.
A SE RATE BUILDING PERMIT MUST BE FILED AND APPROVED BY
THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT BEFORE STARTING WORK.
City of Grapevine Historic Prewmtlon Qepartrnent —836 South Main Street, Grapevine, Texas 78051 - (817) 410,3556
012512
6�
16:
CITY OF GRAPEVINE
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
CASE #CA12 -84
120 East Worth Street
An application was filed in the office of Historic Preservation requesting Historic
Preservation Commission approval for Certificate of Appropriateness #CA12 -84 on the
property addressed as 520 South Main Street.
The application was filed by the owner of 520 South Main Street for the Commission to
hold a public hearing relative to a request for Certificate of Appropriateness #CA12 -84 to
brick veneer, doors and window facade detail for storefronts.
A public hearing regarding this application will be held by the Historic Preservation
Commission on Wednesday, December 19, 2012 at 6:00 P.M., in the Grapevine
Convention & Visitors Bureau, 636 South Main Street, 2nd Floor Board Room, Grapevine,
Texas 76051.
Appendix G, Section 7.(C) of the Grapevine City Code requires that the Commission shall
deny, approve, or approve with conditions any Certificate of Appropriateness application
within 30 days of receipt of a completed application, determining whether the proposed
work is consistent with the regulations contained in this ordinance, in all applicable
ordinances, and in the zoning ordinance designating the Historic Landmark Districts. Upon
posted notice, and notification by regular mail at least five (5) days in advance to the
immediately adjacent property owners as that ownership appears on the last approved tax
roll, the Commission shall conduct a public hearing on the application, at which time an
opportunity is provided for proponents and opponents of the application to present their
views.
If you cannot or do not wish to attend the public hearing, the attached form is
provided for your convenience.
CASE #CA12 -84
520 South Main Street
ALL WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE MUST BE RECEIVED BY THIS OFFICE NO
LATER THAN 12:00 NOON ON WEDNESDAY, December 19, 2012.
Procedure to Respond:
As (an adjacent Property Owner of the subject tract) or (an interested citizen), I (approve) (protest)
and /or (have the following comments)
Print Name, Address, City, Zip, Lot, Block and Subdivision:
Signature: Phone #:
City of Grapevine
Historic Preservation Department
P. O. Box 95104
636 South Main Street
Grapevine, Texas 76099
Telephone: 817 -410 -3197 Fax: 817-410-3038
ROADNAN Legal _4
<null> <null>
<null> <null>
<null> <null>
Legal_3 Legal_2 Legal_1 Situs_Addr C OwnerZip Owner _City_State
<null> BLK 4 L(GRAPEVI � 000210 W < 760515255 GRAPEVINE TX
<null> BLK 4 LTS GRAPEVII` 000520 S t < 760927123 SOUTHLAKE TX
<null> BLK 4 U GRAPEW 000530 S t < 760218221 BEDFORD TX
Owner _Address Owner Name
210 W COLLEGE ST LIPSCOMB, JOE E & M SUZANNE
1230 LAKEWAY DR BIATWIC LLC
1833 BEDFORD RD HUBERT TRUST THE
IISTORIC PRESERVATION
'.O. Box 95104
Jrapevine, Texas 76099
4
0
.8592 10
7 11
GU
GU 12
Z
13
0
14 N PT—
Q
8 co 14S PT
15
W AWN ST
i
TRACT TRACT
IR IA
1R Z
Q
5 2 Cn
CBD
CBD 4 ;3B
R -7.5 R -7.5
3A
W COLLEGE ST
U) 1A
0 2B 2A
U
1 R 3B 3A
MID PT 1
3C 1 GUS PT 1
GU
6A ♦ a &
0
1 inch = 100 feet
C0
U)
Z
Y
Z
W
GU
17
C
E COLLEGE ST
CA l 2-84
520 South Main Street
MEMO TO: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
FROM: DAVID KLEMPIN, HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER
SCOTT WILLIAMS, BUILDING OFFICIAL
RON STOMBAUGH, PLANNER
MEETING DATE: WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 19, 2012
SUBJECT: COMMISSION TO HOLD A WORKSHOP ON PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS TO GRAPEVINE'S HISTORIC PRESERVATION
ORDINANCE REGARDING DESIGN REVIEW PROCEDURES,
AND TAKE ANY NECESSARY ACTION.
BACKGROUND: Grapevine's heritage is uniquely preserved in its Main Street and
residential historic districts. Unlike any of Grapevine's neighbors, the City's history
remains alive in its preserved buildings and neighborhoods. The City of Grapevine, the
Grapevine Historic Preservation Commission and hundreds of interested Grapevine
citizens join the owners of Grapevine's historic properties in the effort of preserving and
revitalizing an environment that promotes improved property values and enriches the
quality of life for Grapevine's citizens and visitors.
Recent challenges encountered by Historic Preservation staff and Historic Preservation
Commission in applying the ordinance has highlighted the need to strengthen it by adding
additional tools for design review and enforcement of the ordinance. At the meeting, staff
will provide the Commission with some tools that could be incorporated into an ordinance.
These tools would help to ensure that future construction within the residential historic
districts would be compatible with the existing historic architectural fabric.
O:\Historic Preservation Comm issior�CAs\2012 CA1Workshop 12 19 12 Agenda Memo.doc
December 14, 2012 (12:43PM)
�T 17
HPC 12.19.12
STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF TARRANT
CITY OF GRAPEVINE
The Historic Preservation Commission for the City of Grapevine, Texas, met in
Public Hearing on Wednesday, December 19, 2012 at 6:00 p.m. in the Grapevine
Convention & Visitors Bureau 2nd Floor Boardroom, 636 South Main Street,
Grapevine, Texas, with the following members present to wit:
Burl Gilliam
R. Lee Derr
Ashley Anderson
Vick Cox
Sean Shope
Margaret Telford
Ted Ware
Shane Wilbanks
Monica Hotelling
Chuck Voelker
Chairman
Vice - Chairman
Commissioner
Commissioner
Commissioner
Commissioner
Commissioner
City Council Liaison
Planning & Zoning Liaison
Alternate
Constituting a quorum with no commissioner(s) absent.
The following city staff present:
Scott Williams Director,
City of Grapevine Development Services
David Klempin Historic Preservation Officer
Mary Bush Historic Preservation Secretary
CALL TO ORDER AND WELCOME
Chairman Burl Gilliam called the Public Hearing to order at 6:00 p.m.
CITIZEN COMMENTS
No comments from citizens were submitted.
December 19, 2012 HPC \Minutes\2012
HPC 12.19.12
WORK SESSION
David Klempin passed around the most recent staff approved Certificates of
Appropriateness for the Commission to Review.
A. Approved Certificate of Appropriateness as follows:
#CA12 -74 for property located at 520 South Main Street, Suite #206;
#CA12 -77 for property located at 104 Jenkins Street;
#CA12 -78 for property located at 312 South Main Street;
#CA12 -79 for property located at 626 Ball Street;
#CA12 -80 for property located at 309 West College Street;
#CA12 -81 for property located at 618 East Wall Street;
#CA12 -82 for property located at 603 South Main Street, Suite #304;
#CA12 -83 for property located at 601 South Main Street, Suite #103.
PUBLIC HEARING
Chairman Burl Gilliam opened the Public Hearing for #CA12 -84 for property
located at 520 South Main Street, Block 4, Lot 2 & 3B, City of Grapevine and
take any necessary action. Chairman Gilliam called on David Klempin to present
the case.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the Historic Preservation Commission approve with
conditions Certificate of Appropriateness #CA12 -84 for the property located at
520 South Main Street legally described as Block 4, Lots 2 & 3B, to the
Grapevine Historic Preservation Ordinance 91 -73 (Appendix G — Grapevine
Code of Ordinances), as amended for the following items:
1. Renovate the existing West College Street elevation of the 520 building to
create two (2) period -style storefronts, each containing three bays for
proposed retail tenant spaces. Work to include installation of veneer brick
over the existing concrete fagade, wood storefront doors and windows,
awnings, and lighting as per attached drawings;
with the condition that brick colors, awnings, lighting fixtures and final door
locations for tenant spaces be staff approved under a separate Certificate
of Appropriateness and a building permit be obtained from the Building
Department.
BACKGROUND:
Certificate of Appropriateness application #CA12 -84 was submitted on December
5, 2012 by the Applicant/Owner Tony Bologna for a renovation of the existing
West College Street elevation of the 520 Building. This portion of the building
was originally a warehouse for Parker Furniture and was built using concrete tilt -
wall construction.
December 19, 2012 HPC \Minutes\2012 2
HPC 12.19.12
The proposed period -style fagade was designed to compliment the Main Street
fagade previously approved by the Commission. The storefront openings would
be cut into the existing concrete wall panels and new supporting lintels would be
installed for structural stabilization of the wall. The exterior of the building would
be clad with veneer brick with projecting brick pilasters. A sign band above the
awnings provides a location for tenant signage. The facades of the two period -
style storefronts would allow for the owner to lease the retail space for up to four
individual tenants.
Staff recommends approval of #CA12 -84 for renovation of the existing West
College Street elevation to create two (2) period -style storefronts for proposed
retail spaces with the condition the brick colors, awnings, lighting fixtures and
final door selection be staff approved under a separate Certificate of
Appropriateness and a building permit be obtained from the Building Department.
Chairman Gilliam asked the owner, Tony Bologna, if he would like to speak. Mr.
Bologna explained the proposed fagade would look like two separate shops but
actually be one 6,000 square foot retail space. Mr. Bologna explained there were
three different designs presented to show the possibility of the space being
divided as two, three or four suites, not identical but all with a similar look.
Chairman Gilliam asked for questions to Mr. Bologna. Commissioner Vick Cox
asked about the white space along the top above the doors; Mr. Bologna said
this would probably be detailed with a brick design inset, adding he was flexible
and appreciated any feedback he receives from the City. City Council Liaison
Shane Wilbanks questioned the parking provided; Mr. Bologna answered it would
have seven parking places. Council Liaison Wilbanks said the parking will be an
issue as before.
Margaret Telford made the motion to close the public hearing. Vick Cox
seconded the motion which prevailed in the following vote:
Ayes: All (Gilliam, Derr, Anderson, Cox, Shope, Telford and Ware)
Nays: None
Margaret Telford made a motion for the approval of #CA12 -75 with the conditions
as presented and all materials be staff approved. Ashley Anderson seconded
the motion which prevailed in a vote of:
Ayes: All (Gilliam, Derr, Anderson, Cox, Shope, Telford and Ware)
Nays: None
WORKSHOP
Chairman Gilliam opened the workshop for a presentation and discussion of the
proposed amendments to Grapevine's Historic Preservation Ordinance regarding
design review procedures. City Council Liaison Shane Wilbanks told of the
discussion at the previous commissioner's meeting to obtain a consultant to
December 19, 2012 HPC \Minutes\2012 3
HPC 12.19.12
advise on the preservation required to protect the Historic Township.
Councilman Wilbanks introduced Scott Williams, the Director of Development
Services, whom he had called on to develop an ordinance to protect this historic
area from the syndrome called "massing and looming" and thereby protecting the
green space original to this area.
Scott Williams explained the Commission was approving drawings appropriate
for the Historic Township, but they were not always in scale to fit with the
neighborhood. He had asked David Klempin to assemble the statistics of original
square footages and building heights, and the same numbers for the new builds
and additions, to put together as bullet points.
Scott proposed Appendix G., Section 7 of the Grapevine Code of Ordinances
Certificates of Appropriateness be amended by the addition of a new paragraph
(c) and relabeling subsequent paragraphs to read as follows:
Proposed Amendments to
Appendix G, Grapevine Code of Ordinances
(Amendments are indicated in bold)
Section 2. That Appendix G., Section 7 Certificates of
Appropriateness is amended by the addition of a new paragraph (c) and
relabeling subsequent paragraphs to read as follows:
(c) Special provisions for Single Family Residences (New and
Additions)
(1) Submittal Requirements
In addition to any other filing requirements, Certificate of
Appropriateness applications for new single family
residential structures, and additions to single family
structures shall be accompanied by the following
documents:
Current photographs of the existing property, showing
the full width of the adjacent properties and structures
on each side of the subject property. If the subject
property is a corner lot, a photograph of the structure
directly across the street of the subject property shall
be included.
• A single drawing showing the elevation of the proposed
structure along with building elevations of structures
on adjacent properties. If the subject lot is a corner lot,
December 19, 2012 HPC \Minutes\2012 4
HPC 12.19.12
the drawing shall also include the structure(s) located
directly across the street.
(2) Design requirements
In addition to the Secretary of the Interior's Standards,
design guidelines, zoning ordinance, building code and
any and all other design requirements, the following shall
apply:
• No portion of a structure shall exceed by more than 10-
feet the measured height of the tallest point of the roof
of any single family structure any portion of which is
within a 300 foot radius of the subject property.
• Total floor area of all structures on the subject property
shall not exceed by more than 10 percent, the total floor
area of all structures on any lot on which a single family
residential structure is located, any portion of which is
located within a 300 foot radius.
Under no circumstances shall the floor area of all
structures on any lot exceed 3400 square feet.
No more than 65 percent of the total floor area of the
structures on a lot may be located above the first floor.
Sideyard setback plane. No portion of a structure may
extend beyond the sideyard setback planes. For the
purposes of this section, a sideyard setack plane is a
plane that begins 14 feet above the required sideyard
setback line, and slopes upward toward the interior of
the lot at a 45 degree angle (1:1 slope).
Exceptions:
1. Chimneys
2. Plumbing and Mechanical vents,
3. Dormers that:
a) are not in excess of eight -feet in width
b) are not closer than six -feet to another
dormer; and
c) do not cause the aggregated width of all
dormers on the same elevation to exceed 20-
feet in width
December 19, 2012 HPC \Minutes\2012 5
HPC 12.19.12
• Lots shall not be subdivided such that they are less
than 50- feet in width.
• Lots shall not be replatted such that the resulting lot
width of any lot would exceed by more than 20
percent the average lot width of all single family
residential lots of which any portion is located within
a 300 foot radius of the boundary of the property
being replatted.
• In the event of a conflict between any of these
requirements and any other guidelines, rules or
ordinances, the most restrictive requirement shall
prevail.
Section 3. Any person violating any of the provisions of this ordinance
shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be
fined in a sum not to exceed Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense
and a separate offense shall be deemed committed each day during or on which
an offense occurs or continues.
Section 4. All ordinances or any parts thereof in conflict with the terms
of this ordinance shall be and hereby are deemed repealed and of no force or
effect.
Section 5. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phase of this
ordinance shall for any reason be held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect
the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance.
Section 6. The fact that the present ordinances and regulations of the
City of Grapevine, Texas are inadequate to properly safeguard the health, safety,
morals, peace and general welfare of the inhabitants of the City of Grapevine,
Texas, creates an emergency for the immediate preservation of the public
business, property, health, safety and general welfare of the public which
requires that this ordinance shall become effective from and after the date of its
passage, and it is accordingly so ordained.
Scott said we have a great inventory of homes in the Township; capped at 3,400
square feet was more than generous for a historic home. Commissioner Ashley
Anderson asked him if "with the 10% could one go over 3,400 square feet ?" Scott
said no, 3,400 square would be the maximum size, and that for a small lot a
percentage ratio will protect from overbuild for the lot size.
December 19, 2012 HPC \Minutes\2012 6
HPC 12.19.12
Commissioner Sean Shope asked how many 3,400 square feet homes were in
the historic district. David Klempin said there were three to four homes. Council
Liaison Shane Wilbanks said a neighborhood of 1,200 square foot homes would
be protected from a 3,400 square foot home. Sean said the balance to the
success of the district was getting a product size some homeowners would need.
P & Z Liaison Monica Hotelling said you learn to live in smaller space if you want
to live in that district.
Scott said this ordinance would cover the entire district with the option for an
appeal as always. Margaret asked if this would have applied to a smaller house
such as the 310 East College with the "addition ". Scott answered affirmatively
saying that if the proposed ordinance had been applied to this home, it would
have prevented the over - build. Vick asked if this would also cover the D.E. Box
addition, David Klempin answered yes. Vick said the 10% Rule will come into
play often. Commissioner Ted Ware said places with very small houses may
need some discretion. Ashley Anderson stated she had concerns about
encroaching on property owner rights by having a 3,400 square foot limit. Scott
explained the Jackson - Walker Law firm and Matthew Boyle, City of Grapevine
Attorney, had also reviewed the ordinance as proposed and did not have
concerns.
Scott said upstairs square footage could be no more than 65 percent. David
agreed stating the homes original to Grapevine's Historic Township are one -story
or one and one -half story structures. Scott said the presented drawing
represented the ordinance as proposed, the part marked red is what would have
prevented the 310 East College structure from looming. He said the R 7.5 zoning
requires a six foot setback for the side yard. David said the West College
structure has large dormers, the proposed ordinance would limit dormers to eight
feet wide and require six feet in between. Sean Shope complimented Scott's
work on the presented proposal.
Scott said the lot sizes of the Township were developed with most being 50 feet
wide. He also said this ordinance allowed asking for a 20 percent increase in lot
size above the average lot size within 300 feet when replatting property. He
stated this ordinance would provide a guideline and an excellent tool for the
Commission's toolbox.
Ted Ware asked about the limitation of 65 percent upstairs, Scott said if the
home had an attached garage it would be included, therefore a 1,000 square foot
home including the garage in the square footage could have 650 square feet on
the second floor. David gave as an example, the 310 East College house has
more second floor square footage than the first floor.
David thanked Scott Williams for presenting and answering the Commissioner's
questions. He added the ordinance would also not allow front entry garages as
they were not appropriate for the historic district's period of significance of 1875
December 19, 2012 HPC \Minutes\2012 7
HPC 12.19.12
to 1940. Garages had been detached structures and there were no front entry
garages in Grapevine until the 1950's.
David said to wrap this up they would need to take any necessary action. If this
were approved the ordinance could move forward for a City Council Workshop.
These additions to the ordinance would give the Commission a toolbox, a check
list, to consider for each case. He recommended bringing forth a motion. Ted
made a motion to take the ordinance before City Council for their review.
Discussion followed saying the next workshop would be the second Tuesday in
February 2013; there was still January to consider the proposed ordinance. Ted
withdrew his motion. Vice -Chair Lee Derr said he thought 10 percent was too
tight and should be reconsidered. Commissioner Margaret Telford reminded all if
there was no action there could be another `bops" such as 310 East College.
Ted Ware made a motion to keep on the table the proposed amendments as
presented for general concept. Margaret Telford seconded the motion, which
prevailed by the following vote:
Ayes: 4 (Gilliam, Cox, Telford and Ware)
Nays: 3 (Anderson, Derr and Shope
David introduced Suzanne Brady who was present, as the new owner of the
vacant lot at 413 East Texas Street in the Millican Place Addition.
Suzanne and her husband, David Brady, are planning to build a home there
based on the plans of a Southern Living Award Winning cottage. They intend to
bring the plans forward for consideration at the January 2013 HPC meeting.
MINUTES
Chairman Gilliam called to consider the minutes as written. Sean Shope made
the motion to accept the October 24, 2012 minutes. Vick Cox seconded the
motion, which prevailed by the following vote:
Ayes: All (Gilliam, Derr, Anderson, Cox, Shope, Telford and Ware)
Nays: None
ADJOURNMENT
Margaret Telford made a motion to adjourn the meeting. Ted Ward seconded the
motion, which prevailed in the following vote:
Ayes: All (Gilliam, Derr, Anderson, Cox, Shope, Telford and Ware)
Nays: None
December 19, 2012 HPC \Minutes\2012 8
HPC 12.19.12
PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF GRAPEVINE, TEXAS, ON THIS THE
23" DAY OF JANUARY 23, 2013.
ATTEST:
v�
J
J
2c �
APPROVED:
CHAIRMAN
December 19, 2012 HPC \Minutes\2012 9
T . E 'V-_ .i. s
19 December, 2012
Tony Bologna
BIATWIC, LLC
520 South Main Street
Grapevine, TX 76051
A Future With A Past
RE: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS # CA12 -84
520 SOUTH MAIN STREET
GRAPEVINE, TX 76051
This letter confirms on December 19, 2012, Historic Preservation Commission
approved with conditions CA12 -84 for property addressed at 520 South Main
Street legally described as Block 4 Lot 2 & 3B, Grapevine, Grapevine, City of
Addition, Grapevine, Texas. The following was approved on this Certificate of
Appropriateness:
Brick veneer, doors and window fagade detail for storefronts with the conditions
that all exterior materials, stone, windows, doors and paint colors be approved
under a separate Certificate of Appropriateness.
Per approved drawings with the condition a permit is obtained from the Building
Department.
Please note this approved Certificate of Appropriateness is not an approved
Building Permit and a permit is / is not required. Contact the City of
Grapevine's Building Departmen at 817 -410 -3165 for fees and information
regarding permits.
Thank you,
David Klempin
Historic Preservation Officer
cc: Property Owner
CA File
7'
Jta) .1 t112, Tc _tip., '_60,_1
P ' 1
520 South Main Street "Before and After"
vj
vt
c
0
4-0
cu
(1)
W
VJ
Aw
(1)
75
m 0
LLI
LLJ
U)
D
CL
to
z
0
LLJ
CL
U)
z
M uj
F— 0-
U cr
C)
z
0
L)
uj
Vw
W
W
0
U)
w 0
U)
0
N
N
Lli
Ql
West College Street Elevation of 520 Main Street Building
'AAPEVINE
View of West College Street from Moin Street=M"-�'_
PuRSuar L
DATE DY :�
DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT SEk
CONTACT BUILDING INSPE(' " ! .
N
T
c
O
w
L
r�
V J
0
U
W
U
LL
LOLA
►: Z
LLJ
czc
� L
1
Lil Q
W
w L11
0
IL
w
Vw
w
w
f
N
z
a
Yl
F
0
w 0
N
N
N
Z
L
w
z �
F.
L'
Z
7
N
y
r
r
rn
in
in
w
U
I-
m
m
T 5