HomeMy WebLinkAbout1986-09-02 Public Hearing t
�
�
�
�
;
i:
l
F
�
f
�
�
9
�
�:
F
'g
{.
I y
�
I!I
�
�
#
�
1
3
��''� AGENDA �
I CITY OF GRAPEVINE , TEXAS �
SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING �
TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 2, 1986 AT 6 :30 P.M. �
COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 413 MAIN STREET €
�
t
�
�
�
f
!; I . CALL TO ORDER �
i
I, ''
; II. PUBLIC HEARING E
�
�
� City Council to conduct a public hearing relative �
i to a statement of intent to increase the tax rate �
�� calculated pursuant to Section 26 . 04 (d) of the E
' Property Tax Code. �
� �
III. MISCELLANEOUS REPORTS AND/OR DISCUSSION �
¢
�
IV. ADJOURNMENT �
�
�
�
i
IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 6252-17, V.A.T.C.S. , AS AMENDED BY �
'i CHAPTER 227 , ACTS OF THE 61ST LEGISLATURE, REGULAR SESSION, �
' THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA WAS PREPARED AND �
� POSTED ON THIS THE 29TH DAY OF AUGUST, 1986 AT 3 : 00 P.M. '
i
, C��w �Z�, �
City Secretary '
�
i
i
�� �
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
!
i =
�
�
�
i
1 STATE OF TEXAS
' COUNTY OF TARRANT
� CITY OF GRAPEVINE �
The City Council of the City of Grapevine, Texas met in Special Session on
this the 2nd day of September, 1986 at 6:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers, 413 �
�
�
Main Street, with the follow m�.mbers present to-wit:
�
' Tc[n Powers Mayor
Ted R. Ware Mayor Pro Tem
Ron Dyer Council Member =
Jim Glynn Council Member
Sharron Spencer Council Member
I C. Shane Wilbanks Council Member �
�� Lynn R. Niedernleier Council Nl��nber �
� constituting a quonun, with the following members of the City Staff:
k
Dennis E. Dawson City Manager
J Kelvin Knauf Assistant City Manager `
�
; John F. Boyle, Jr. City Attorney
' William L. White Finance Director
' Karen Spann City Secretary
;I
i
` C,�LL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Pocaers.
� PUBLIC HEARING, IN'I�NT TO INCREA.SE TF� TAX RATE
i
,' Mayor Pow�ers advised the purpose of the special meeting was to conduct a
,
� public hearing relative to a statement of intent to increase the tax rate
j calculated pursuant to Section 26.04(d) of the Property Tax Code. He then �
' opened the hearing.
" Finance Director Bill White offered introductory co�nents, noting a decrease
� was proposed in the actual tax rate from 49� to 44� per $100 valuation. This r
would create an increase in 86-87 revenues over 85-86 revenues of 26.6� due to
� reappraisals of property throughout the City.
�
' Mayor Pow�ers then invited members of the audience to speak regarding the
' issue, and the following persons offered camients:
' 1. Mr. Wilbur Goltz, owner of Southwest Marine, 418 E. Northw�est
' Highway, noted the Tarrant Appraisal District had tripled the b
appraised value of his undeveloped comnercial property. �
�
'' 2. Mr. Michael Cannella, 3530 Mercury Drive, requested clarification of :
� the percentage figure and questioned the need for increased revenues.
3. Ms. Judy Sherer, 1620 Choteau Circle, felt the tax rate was too high ;�
i and inquired about increased expenditures.
Mayor Powers responded to their inquiries and briefly reviewed some of the ;
�;
� 86-87 proposed budget items. E
;
'' The following correspondence was then read into the record: �
�
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ �
t
August 26, 1986
, �
E
City Hall �
Grapevine, Texas 76051 �
k'
k
I will not be able to attend the tax meeting on September 2, but I �
do want to express my strong desire not to raise taxes in Grapevine. f'
— — f
To me it is so very foolish to build the things that are not �
, necessary when we are in so much deep debt all ready. "
�
:� �
�
�'
�
�
�
�
� �
9/2/86
I am a senior citizen and cx�m two houses in Grapevine. I just don't
see how I can pay any more taxes than I'm all ready paying. Am
doing well to pay what I'm all ready paying. Personally I think it
is a sin and disgrace to make it so hard on people for the benefit
of the big shots. Especially when its all uncalled for.
Yours truly, �
�
Alpha Blevins �
503 Vine Street j
Euless, Texas 76040
'� ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
�i
August 25, 1986
I
! Mr. Mayor and the Grapevine City Council:
i
�
I wr�uld like to go on record as expressing my extreme displeasure �
for the proposed budget and large tax increase now swinging over the
taxpayers like a forbidding pendulum.
i _
I Do you plan a tax increase every year? If so, just how do you
� expect the citizens to keep pace when our salaries aren't increasing
at the percentage that our taxes are? We're being bombarded from
all angles with a 3� county tax increase, a 10.9� increase
(proposed) in school taxes, an asinine increase in city taxes, and
who only knows how much the state will demand! �
The bulk of this tax increase, as I understand it, is the result of
the new city manager's rec�ndations. While state agencies are
cutting budgets and staff, Grapevine wants to increase the budget
and staff by an unreasonable and enormous nlunber. The timing is at
a bad point in t�me itself and should be considered as too much a
burden for the taxpayers to carry at the present time.
If, and only if, these extra dollars and staff are needed, I suggest
they be phased in gradually, but I further suggest that you take
; another look at improving Grapevine, particularly the appearance. I
applaud the downtown project and what has been done is beautiful, �
but it is tragic when you can drive only a few blocks east and/or �
west of Main Street and see yards filled with trash and abandoned �
vehicles. Why not concentrate on cleaning this up? This wr�uld cost �
nothing except the people involved and the fines they should pay for �
non compliance. ;
�
,
! Therefore, we need a larger reduction in the proposed budget and i
certainly no new taxes. Progress is not measured in increasing �
' taxes. Also, the psychology involved is not to propose a large �
' budget and make cuts to soothe the tax�ayer into thinking that they �
' will accept the smaller amount. You're playing politics fran the �
� psychological angle and proving that the amount needed isn't really �
that much after all, thinking you will convince taxpayers into a �
state of acceptance and ccenplacency.
If you really have the best interests of Grapevine, you will not �
burden us with t�es and more t�es. The City is growing and so are j
' its needs, but it (taxes) can't be done overnight. �
4
i �
I
; Ronald J. Tillery Sylvia L. Tillery �
' 221 E. Franklin Street 215 E. Franklin Street
� E
I ������������������������������������������������������������������������������
' There being no further comments by a member of the audience or the City �
Council, a motion to close the public hearing was made by Council M,ember Dyer.
Council Nle.mber Spencer offered a second, and the motion prevailed by the
ensuing vote:
�
�
'� �2� �
�
!
� �
I
€
9/2/86 ;:
�
i
;
Ayes: Pawers, Ware, Dyer, Glynn, Spencer, Wilbanks, & Niedermeier
Nays: None $
I
AD�TOURDIl�NT
�
The deliberations of the City Council having been concluded, a motion to
j adjourn the meeting was offered by Council Member Wilbanks and seconded by �
,;
Council M,��nber Niedermeier. The vote prevailed as follows:
'� Ayes: Powers, Ware, Dyer, Glynn Spencer, Wilbanks, & Niedermeier
Nays: None E
�
�
� `
PASSID AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF TI� CITY OF GF2APEVINE, TEXAS on �;
this the 16 th day of �e�tE�, Pr , 1986. e
� �.
�
i
;i APPROVID:
� F
�
i � f
' e�����l/ :
I R
iMayor
i
�
+ A'1'i�E.ST: i>
�
a �
� �'
Cit Secretary �
�
,:.
�
�
'i �
s
� �:
�;
�
�
�
�
:I }
�
�
�
', f
�
�
4'
�
� {
i
�
�
{ �
; �
�
�
�
s
�
�
i �
�
�
�;
�
�
, �,
R
�
�
, �
�
� �
' �
E
�
(3) �
�
a �